6 Photos: Anti-Catholicism During World Youth Day 2011

Economic worries were a thin veil over what has become a severe anti-Catholic strain in Europe.

Listers, a few troubling photographs and the financial rebuttal to the protesters’ supposed primary argument.

“Behold I sent you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.” – Matthew 10:16

“Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword. As it is written: For your sake we are being killed all day long; we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered. No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.” – Romans 8:35-36

Financial Worries or Thinly Veiled Anti-Catholicism?

The mainstream media primarily cited the riots and protests against WYD as a statement against the cost of such an event at a time when Spain is facing a harsh economy.

However, the initial financial numbers from WYD Madrid 2011 are as follows:

Budget: 50 million euros (72 million dollars).
Payment: Seventy percent was funded by the pilgrims themselves and the other thirty percent by the sponsoring companies. The budget was approximately 20% lower than the last World Youth Day in Sydney.

Spain’s Economy: The two million pilgrims that came to Madrid gave a boost to the city’s economy of 230 million dollars according to estimates by the Confederation of Employers of Madrid.

Restaurants: In dining costs alone, around 32 million was spent according to Juan José Blardony, the director general of Madrid’s hospitality association.
Hotels: Hotels reported an occupancy level of 70%, which is usually around 40% in August.
Tourism: The City Council estimates the event brought the Spanish capital 2% of country’s tourism revenue for the entire year.

Photo Credit to Reuters
Comments by American Papist
Comments by Fr. Z
Financial Statements Are as Reported by Rome Reports

15 More Pictures from World Youth Day 2011

Almost 2 Million youth gathered in Madrid along with 14,000 priests, 800 bishops, and the Holy Father.

The official numbers for World Youth Day 2011 in Madrid have been released:
Overall Participation: Around 2 million people
Rank: Madrid as the third most attended World Youth Day.
Countries: 193 nations represented (Italy, Spain, & France had the most)
Cost: 50 million euros (72 million dollars)
Payment: Registration fee for participants and corporate sponsors
Crowd Control: 18,000 police and civil servants
Volunteers: 30,000
Accredited Journalists: 5,000
Final Mass with Pope Benedict XVI: 14,000 priests and 800 bishops concelebrated

 

[All Photos: Official WYD Madrid 2011 Flickr Account]
[WYD Stats]

30 Pictures of World Youth Day 2011

Almost 2 million people from 193 nations gathered together in Madrid to celebrate World Youth Day with the Holy Father.

The official numbers for World Youth Day 2011 in Madrid have been released:
Overall Participation: Around 2 million people
Rank: Madrid as the third most attended World Youth Day.
Countries: 193 nations represented (Italy, Spain, & France had the most)
Cost: 50 million euros (72 million dollars)
Payment: Registration fee for participants and corporate sponsors
Crowd Control: 18,000 police and civil servants
Volunteers: 30,000
Accredited Journalists: 5,000
Final Mass with Pope Benedict XVI: 14,000 priests and 800 bishops concelebrated

[All Photos: Official WYD Madrid 2011 Flickr Account]
[WYD Stats]

10 Biblical Reasons Christ Founded the Papacy

What does the Pope actually do? Wouldn’t a Pope hinder my personal relationship with Christ? Why a Pope at all? By Scripture, this list strives to show that the Pope and the Church allow Catholics to simply live according to and love the same Jesus Christ the Apostles knew and loved.

1. What type of kingdom did Christ intend to bring?

Jesus Christ is a descendent of King David and is referred to as “Son of David” in Scripture.1 Christ’s relation to King David is paramount in understanding the fulfillment of his covenant with God. King David was promised a descendent who would “rule forever” and sit on “David’s throne” forever.2 Christ, as the Eternal King, is certainly the descendent of King David’s who will “rule forever” from King David’s throne. During the exiles of Israel, the people wrote with hope about the New Jerusalem and the Messiah that would usher in the New Davidic Kingdom; thus, any conversation about what is and what is not properly intended by Christ, regarding his Kingdom, must be couched within the template of the Davidic Kingdom.3

 

2. What role did Christ intend for Saint Peter?

In the district of Caesarea Philippi, Christ asks his disciples “Who do men say that the Son of man is?” St. Peter responds, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus then says to St. Peter:

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

What is Christ’s intention for St. Peter with his Kingdom? On its face, the passage affirms two general truths. First, Christ changes Simon Bar-jona’s name to Peter meaning Rock, the foundation of Christ’s kingdom on earth, the Church. In the Old Testament, God changing someone’s name denoted a special calling, a new vocation, e.g., Abram to Abraham, Sarai to Sarah, Jacob to Israel, etc. St. Peter’s name change denotes that he will have a special vocation among the twelve disciples. Second, St. Peter is given the “keys of kingdom,” which comes with ability to bind and loose.4 It is important to note this is one of the few times Christ ever mentions the “Church.”

 

3. What is the biblical backing for St. Peter’s role in accordance with the Davidic Kingdom?

If Christ’s Kingdom retains a unique Davidic character, is there any Old Testament evidence that illuminates the keys given to St. Peter? Yes, it is clear that Christ is rewording a passage from Isaiah that speaks of a position within the Davidic Kingdom:

And I will place on his shoulder the key of the house of David; he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open. And I will fasten him like a peg in a sure place, and he will become a throne of honor to his father’s house.

The similarities in the Old Testament passage are striking. In both passages, a person within the Davidic Kingdom is given keys that come with the authority to open and shut or bind and loose.5

 

4. What is the position and what is its purpose?

Reading Isaiah 22 and Matthew 16 together, the position or office given to St. Peter appears to be one of a steward or vicar. The vicar is the person who governs in the king’s stead when the king is away. He does not have the authority to change the teachings of the king, but he does have the authority to enforce and clarify them. In King David’s time, this person would rule when David was off to war or some other errand. In our age, the Vicar of Christ, aka the Office of the Papacy, governs the Church according to Christ’s teachings until Christ the King returns for his Kingdom. Notice David’s Vicar has one key to open and close the earthly kingdom, but Christ’s Vicar has two keys: one for heaven and one for earth.

 

5. What does the Catechism of the Catholic Church say about St. Peter and the Papacy?

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:

882. “The Pope, Bishop of Rome and Peter’s successor, ‘is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful.’ ‘For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.'”

The Four Marks of the Church: One, Holy, Catholic, & Apostolic

6. Is there a distinction between Petros and Petra?

A popular grammatical question on the Matthew passage often takes the form of the following: But in Greek, St. Peter’s name is Petros and Christ says, “upon this petra,” so Christ was not referring to St. Peter, was he? First, note that the premise of this question is that for over two thousand years, the Office of the Papacy has been founded upon a missed nuance in Greek grammar that no one apparently noticed, including those Early Church Christians who spoke and wrote in ancient Greek.

A few thoughts. First, while the Gospel is written in Greek, Christ arguably spoke Aramaic; thus, “You are kepha and on this kepha I will build my Church.” It’s the same word. Furthermore, St. Peter is referred to as Cephas, meaning Rock throughout the New Testament.6 The distinction in Greek is slightly more nuanced.

Greek is an inflected (not “reflexive”) language, which means that the forms of nouns change based on the function a word is performing in a sentence. When this happens, the base meaning of the word remains the same. The inflection communicates information about how the word is being used grammatically but not what it means.

In the case of petros vs. petra, the change is not an inflection. Petros and petra are two different words in Greek. They are similar because they are cognates (just as “president” and “presider” are cognates in English but are nonetheless two different words with different, though related, meanings). Because they are two different words, the inflection (change of form) of petros and petra is not what is at issue here. The basic meanings of the terms is.

The point the article is making is that in Attic Greek there was a slight difference in meaning between the two, but in Koine Greek (the dialect of the New Testament) they were synonyms.

Petros and petra are two distinct words, but without a distinction in meaning. The grammatical distinction does not import any error on the historical understanding that St. Peter is the Rock referred to in St. Matthew’s passage.7

 

7. Is not Christ The Rock?

There are two general arguments here. First, that Christ alone bears the title The Rock; thus, it is not appropriate to grant that title to St. Peter. Second, that the passage in Matthew 16 is referring to Christ as the Rock of the Church.

First, Christ is not the only person to hold the title/name Rock. Christ is referred to as the Rock, because he is the foundation of all things; however, in the rabbinical tradition, Abraham also bore the title Rock. Isaiah 51:1-3 states, “Look to the rock from which you were hewn… look to Abraham your father.” Cardinal Ratzinger comments on the similarity between St. Peter and Abraham as Rock:

Abraham, the father of faith, is by his faith the rock that holds back chaos, the onrushing primordial flood of destruction, and thus sustains creation. Simon, the first to confess Jesus as the Christ and the first witness of the Resurrection, now becomes by virtue of his Abrahamic faith, which is renewed in Christ, the rock that stands against the impure tide of unbelief and its destruction of man.8

Christ retains the name The Rock, but both Abraham and St. Peter have carried the title Rock as well. Regarding, the St. Matthew passage, it was Jesus Christ who named Simon Bar-Jona, Peter, the Rock. It would not make any sense for Christ to name St. Peter Rock and then be – without any contextual clues of a transition – be referring to himself as the Rock upon which he will build his Church. The entire context of the passage focuses on Peter: his name is changed, he is explicitly given the keys, and his authority is explained. There is no grammatical reason why Christ would be referring to himself in the passage, especially since, again, it was he who changed Peter’s name. 

 

The following considerations are meant to intuit certain protestant hesitancies that are common when discussing the biblical foundation of the papacy.

 

8. How can I follow both Christ and the Pope?

If the papacy is properly understood, as defined by the Catholic Church, then to be obedient to Christ is to follow the Pope and to follow the Pope is to have confidence in one’s understanding of Christ. Imagine a citizen of King David’s saying, “I am a citizen of King David’s Kingdom, but I will not obey his Vicar.” The statement makes little sense, as the Vicar is selected by the King and governs according to the King’s laws. The Vicar is nothing in and of himself. The Vicar always points to the King. The Pope always points to Christ. Cardinal Ratzinger taught that the pope was the “Advocate of Christian Memory.” He holds the People of God to the memory of Christ and his teachings, the identity of the community.

In short, the Pope holds the King’s people to the King’s laws while the King is away. He is the Rock upon which the King has built his Church and has been given the keys of authority.

 

9. Is the Pope a middleman between us and God?

Protestants often lament that the Pope is a middleman between Catholics and God, which in turn distorts the ability of a Catholic to have a “personal relationship with God.” Unlike King David’s Kingdom, though our King Jesus Christ is gone, we can still communicate with him, embrace his true presence in the Eucharist, and have a personal relationship with him. It is painfully obvious, however, in our modern world that the concept of a “personal relationship with Christ” has spun wildly out of control. With each generation, Protestant pastors attempt to reinvent the Christian religion by dogmatically projecting their personal experiences onto others. They form new “churches” upon their new understanding of Christ and Christianity. Across the board, “personal relationship with Christ” is in truth a personalized Jesus. Jesus becomes simply a concept to be molding to this or that individual’s beliefs.

The Protestant Reformation splintered the Church and the Protestants have been splintering ever since. Everyone claims their own version of Christ, and with no perceived Christ-given-authority to rule what is true and what is false. “Churches” split and Christians are divided. The Pope exists to purify, guide, and defend the Church’s relationship with Jesus Christ. The unified Church under the Pope – the Advocate of Christian Memory – holds the Church to the teachings of Christ and his apostles. He is a bulwark preventing Catholics from drifting off into the fads and ideologies of the age.

In essence, the Catholic life is one about living the Christ-centered life. It is not a life spent wondering whether or not this teaching of Christ or that new “church” is right or not. The Pope frees Catholics from worrying what is the Christian life, to simply living the Christian life.

 

10. What does Christ want for his Church?

Assuming all that has already been addressed, there is one specific prayer of Christ that contextualizes the greater conversation of one unified Church. In the Gospel of John, the 17th chapter is arguably the central passage of the entire New Testament and one of the most underestimated passages as well. The chapter is Christ’s prayer for his Church. Toward the end of the passage, Christ focuses on unity:

That they all may be one, as thou, Father, in me, and I in thee; that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. And the glory which thou hast given me, I have given to them; that they may be one, as we also are one: I in them, and thou in me; that they may be made perfect in one: and the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast also loved me. Father, I will that where I am, they also whom thou hast given me may be with me; that they may see my glory which thou hast given me, because thou hast loved me before the creation of the world. Just Father, the world hath not known thee; but I have known thee: and these have known that thou hast sent me.

Christ’s prayer for the Church begs certain questions from those who call themselves Christians: does the perpetual fracturing of one protestant group into another resemble the unity of Christ’s prayer? Does the infighting and strife of broken communities show the world Christ was really the Son of God? Do thousands upon thousands of contradictory Christian communities lend belief to the fact the one true God came to earth? The way Christianity is currently lived in the world promotes the belief that charity may be separated from unity. The God’s charity and God’s unity may be divorced.9

There are other questions that may be asked of God. Did Christ come and establish a community with no authority to guide it? Did Christ come and give us the truth without any way to confirm it? Did Christ come and preach unity and charity only to leave humanity to fracture and break under sin into thousands of contradictory communities? Did Christ come and bring humanity The Word only to have no authority to interpret it? No. He brought a Kingdom and a Kingdom structure. The Office of the Papacy unites us in one Church, one God, one Christ, and one Truth.

The Papacy does not replace Christ or stand as a threat to a personal relationship with Christ, but rather the Papacy is a means of purifying a Catholic’s personal relationship. Followers of Christ should not be forced their whole life to wonder what is and what is not Christianity. There is no need to reinvent or rediscover the faith in every generation. The Pope and the Church allow Catholics to simply live by and love the same Jesus Christ the Apostles knew and loved. 

The Pope holds the King’s people to the King’s laws, so, in fulfillment of Christ’s prayer for the Church, the People of God may show the world Jesus Christ by their unity and charity.

  1. Son of David: Matt 1:1-2; 9:27-29; Mk 10:47, 48 []
  2. King David’s Throne: I Chron 17:14; Ps 89:35-36; Luke1:31 []
  3. David’s Kingdom: Is. 9:6-7; 11:1-3; Jer 33:14-15, 17, 19-21, 26; Ps 132:10-14, 17; Luke 1:31-33, 68-71; II Tim 2:8; Rev 5:5, 22:16; Rom 1:3 []
  4. Keys of the Kingdom: Matt 16:13-20 []
  5. Keys in the Old Testament: The verse is Isaiah 22:22, but the entire passage is notable for discerning the vocation of St. Peter. For instance, the passage is actually taking the keys from one steward to the next. This detail is often used to combat those Protestant circles who affirm St. Peter had a unique role, but argue the role died with he died. []
  6. Cephas in the New Testament: cf. John 1:42; I Cor 1:12, 3:22, 9:5 []
  7. Petros/Petra: The explanation is taken from the article Petros v. Petra by Jimmy Akin. Another article consulted was the Catholic Answers article Peter the Rock. SPL had previously held that the petros/petra was one of inflection and corrected this mistake during an update. Updated: 3/3/14 []
  8. Abraham/Peter Rock: Quote taken from Called to Communion, Cardinal Ratzinger, Ignatius Press, p. 56. []
  9. Christ’s Prayer: St. John 17:21-25. []

6 Catholic Thoughts Concerning the “Game of Thrones” Series

Time Magazine has called George R. R. Martin, “the American Tolkien.” His A Song of Ice and Fire series, more commonly referred to as the Game of Thrones series, has broken into the realm few fantasy works do – mainstream America.

Listers, Time Magazine has called George R. R. Martin, “the American Tolkien.” His A Song of Ice and Fire series, more commonly referred to as the Game of Thrones series, has broken into the realm few fantasy works do – mainstream America. The series’ growing popularity is evident in the recently released hardback fifth volume in the saga, and the premiere of the HBO TV adaptation, the Game of Thrones series. A few thoughts on this “American Tokien’s” work…

The following critique is written regarding the books 1-4.

1. Unique Style of Writing:

Each chapter of Martin’s work bears the name of the character it follows. Allowing for a host of perspectives, Martin is able to weave complicated, but followable political schemes. The popular name of the series overall and the name of the first novel, The Game of Thrones, sums up the saga completely. It is a narrative that focuses more on political posturing and wit, than the traditional foci of fantasy, e.g., fight scenes, magic, creatures, etc. If you are looking for a story riddled with subtleties and Machiavellian tactics, the Game of Thrones is that and some.

2. Characters over World:

As alluded, Martin composes a character-based narrative. Avid fantasy writings can attest to the fact that many authors fall into the sub-par range, because they are more interested in describing their world than making the characters seem real. Rigid stereotypes, flat personalities, and predictable outcomes plague most fantasy literature, but Martin strives to produce believable, anti-stereotypical, and unpredictable characters.

3. The Characters:

Coupling his unique chapter-character style with complicated characters lends the Game of Thrones series an unpredictable and entertaining plot line. One of the aids in this approach is the fact that it would be difficult, particularly in the first few novels, to actually state who is the main protagonist and antagonist. Another literary fault of the fantasy world is that no matter what danger your main character(s) find themselves in, they will escape. It leads the reader to just be waiting for the Deus ex Machina moment to happen. However, in GoT, this is not the case. It is not uncommon for a character to take a main protagonist role only to be unexpectedly killed.

Bran & Jon Stark, Game of Thrones. HBO

4. Modern Good & Evil:

The literary trap that Martin does not avoid is that of modernity. One such pitfall is the inability for modernity to understand virtue. Almost every character in the series is an anti-hero. They are lesser evils fighting against greater evils. Those characters which do appear to be good speak of honor, not virtue. Inevitably, this leads to vague notions of morality based off naval gazing, i.e., seeking the “right” and “honorable” answer by self-searching and not external standards. However, even these vague moral heroes are naive, exploitable, and ultimately lost within a Machiavellian political power structure. It is a pit almost all modern literature falls into – modernity understands evil, but it does not understand good.1

5. Sexuality:

The series is riddled with sexual activity. It is granted that a work focusing on political battles for the throne must reveal the sexual connections amongst the characters. Lines for the throne(s) are the basis of almost all political posturing within a monarchy. However, the book goes way beyond what is necessary and includes graphic sexual descriptions. Moreover, it moves beyond even those relationships which are important to the storyline and includes random sexual experiences that are completely superfluous to the story. The books contain sexual details of incest, child brides, and masturbation. Moreover, his description of sexuality is very juvenile in tone, and reads more like a male teen fantasy than reality.

6. The American Tolkien…

Time magazine’s statement – which appeared as a critique after the fourth volume – can only be seen as a shallow comparison of popularity. As stated, it is uncommon for a fantasy writer to become popular in the mainstream, and those who do accomplish this task are almost always compared to Tolkien. J. R. R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings single handedly created the modern fantasy genre, while also adhering to a classical understanding of Good and Evil. If Martin and Tolkien are compared by their under-gird philosophies, then Martin appears to be another shallow modern author who thrives off describing evil and sexuality.

  1. Update (1-12-13) A similar comparison may be made of the Lord of the Rings movies. As moderns, we are able to depict evil, but when the modern mind must depict the good and virtuous life, it is lost. We see how modernity had to recreate Tolkien’s heroes, most notably in turning Aragorn from a virtuous character to a insecure navel-gazer. To wit, as moderns, not only do we not understand the virtuous life but we also find it unbelievable; thus, it has vanished from our art and literature. Naturally, since we cannot grasp the entirety of the good, we – as moderns – falter on understanding the corruption of the good, evil. Our present culture displays this most notably in abortion, gay marriage, and the basic belief that there can be no wrong between two consenting adults. In retrospect, depict may have been a better word choice than understand. []

6 Types of Extraordinary Demonic Activity

In An Exorcist Tells His Story, the Chief Exorcist of Rome, Fr. Gabriele Amorth categorizes demonic activity into ordinary and extraordinary. The former is simply temptation, while the latter is broken down into the six main categories listed below…

In An Exorcist Tells His Story, the Chief Exorcist of Rome, Fr. Gabriele Amorth categorizes demonic activity into ordinary and extraordinary. The former is simply temptation, while the latter is broken down into the six main categories listed below. Fr. Amorth’s work strives to remind everyone – especially priests and bishops – that demonic activity is real, and those suffering under its effects should be able to find help within Holy Mother Church. He calls upon the Church to restore the Office of the Exorcist to every diocese, and he reminds the faithful that the best defense against the demonic is the sacramental life.

 

1. External Physical Pain Caused by Satan:

As its name suggestions, demonic activity can manifest as physical pain. Fr. Amorth points to Saint John of the Cross, the Cure of Ars, and Padre Pio as historical examples of those who suffered physical beatings and torment by demons. However, since this “external form of persecution does not affect the soul,” it is understood that “there has never been the need for an exorcism, only for prayers.”

2. Demonic Possession:

“This occurs when Satan takes full possession of the body (not the soul); he speaks and acts without the knowledge or consent of the victim, who therefore is morally blameless.” In reference to the question, is there a stereotypical possession or referential model, Fr. Amorth advises the following, “to fix a set ‘model’ for demonic possession would be a serious mistake; the affliction runs the gamut of symptoms and severity.”

3. Diabolical Oppression:

“There is no possession, loss of consciousness, or involuntary action and word,” just severe to mild events that plague the individual. Fr. Amorth points to Job’s severe afflictions and St. Paul’s thorn in his flesh (II Cor 12:7). Whereas “possession is rare,” Fr. Amorth reveals that he and his fellow exorcists “run into a great number oif people who have been struck by the devil in their health, jobs, or relationships.”

Detail of painting depicting Harrowing of Hell
Harrowing of Hell

4. Diabolic Obsession:

“Symptoms include sudden attacks, at times ongoing, of obsessive thoughts, sometimes even rationally absurd, but of such nature that the victim is unable to free himself.” Moreover, “the obsessed person lives in a perpetual state of prostration, desperation, and attempts at suicide. Almost always obsession influences dreams.”

5. Diabolic Infestation:

“Infestations affect houses, things, or animals.”

6. Diabolical Subjugation, or Dependence:

Fr. Amorth explains, “people fall into this form of evil when thy voluntarily submit to Satan. The two most common forms of dependence are the blood pact with the devil and the consecration to Satan.”

11 Quotes from CS Lewis’ The Great Divorce

The Anglican author Clive Staples Lewis wrote The Great Divorce in response to William Blake’s The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. In his… Continue Reading…

The Anglican author Clive Staples Lewis wrote The Great Divorce in response to William Blake’s The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. In his story – which he asks his readers to remember is a “fantasy” – the damned can visit heaven. In this brilliant narrative, Lewis lays an excellent foundation for the discussion of God as the Good, Being-itself, and Evil, not as an equal opposite, but as a privation of good, of being.

1. On Evil:

“Evil can be undone, but it cannot ‘develop’ into good. Time does not heal it.”1

2. On Heaven and Hell:

“If we insist on keeping Hell (or even Earth) we shall not see Heaven: if we accept Heaven we shall not be able to retain even the smallest and most intimate souvenirs of Hell.”2

3. On Ghosts:

“They were in fact ghosts: man-shaped stains on the brightness of that air.”3

4. On the Free Play of Inquiry:

“What you now call the free play of inquiry has neither more nor less to do with the ends for which intelligence was given you than masturbation has to do with marriage.”4

5. On Shame:

“Shame is like that. If you will accept it – if you will drink the cup to the bottom – you will find it very nourishing: but try to do anything else with it and it scalds.”5

6. On Suffering:

“That is what mortals misunderstand. They say of temporal suffering, ‘no future bliss can make up for it,’ not knowing that Heaven, once attained, will work backwards and turn even that agony into a glory.”6

7. On Evangelism:

“There have been some who were so occupied in spreading Christianity they never gave a thought to Christ.”7

8. On Will:

“There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ All that are in Hell, choose it. Without that self-choice there could be no Hell. No soul that seriously and constantly desires joy will ever miss it. Those who seek find. To those who knock it is opened.”8

9. On Loving:

“You cannot love a fellow-creature fully till you love God.”9

10. On Falsities:

“Brass is mistaken for gold more easily than clay is.”10

11. On Pity:

“Pity was meant to be a spur that drives joy to help misery. But it can be used the wrong way round. It can be used for a kind of blackmailing. Those who choose misery can hold joy up to ransom, by pity.”11

  1. VIII []
  2. IX []
  3. 20 []
  4. 41 []
  5. 61 []
  6. 69 []
  7. 74 []
  8. 75 []
  9. 100 []
  10. 105 []
  11. 131 []

13 Biblical Reasons St. Peter Was the “Prince of the Apostles”

“Prince of the Apostles” means that St. Peter held a certain primacy over the other eleven. Understanding St. Peter’s unique position among the twelve and the unique ministries he exercised lays an excellent groundwork for a discussion of Christ’s founding of the Papacy.

Listers, “Prince of the Apostles” means that St. Peter held a certain primacy over the other eleven. Understanding St. Peter’s unique position among the twelve and the unique ministries he exercised lays an excellent groundwork for a discussion of Christ’s founding of the Papacy. While resources on this subject are abundant, SPL recommends Cardinal Ratzinger’s Called to Communion.

 

St. Peter’s Place of Primacy Among the Twelve

1. St. Peter & the Sons of Zebedee:

Sts. Peter, James, and John are a special group of disciples that are allowed to witness the Transfiguration1 and accompany Christ to the Mount of Olives.2 In each event, St. Peter, the Rock, is singled out. At the Mount of Olives, Christ finds all three asleep, but it is St. Peter he addresses. During the Transfiguration, it is St. Peter who speaks for the disciples.

2. Christ Calls Simon Peter First:

In St. Luke 5:1-11, Christ calls his first disciples, and the first is Simon Peter. According to Cardinal Ratzinger, the “call of Peter appears as the original pattern of apostolic vocation par excellence.”3

3. The List of Disciples According to Scripture:

Every time the disciples are listed, St. Peter is listed first.4 Furthermore, when referring to the disciples, sometimes only St. Peter is mentioned by name, e.g., “And Simon and those who were with him,” and “Now Peter and those who were with him”.5

4. Unique Acts:

St. Peter is the only one to try to walk on the water (Mt 14:28ff) and he is the one that brings up the famous question of how many times we must forgive.6 Even St. Peter’s shadow was an instrument of healing.7

St. Peter Healing the Crippled Beggar (1530-1532)

The Name Change: The Rock

5. The Changing of St. Peter’s Name:

While it was common for Rabbis to give nicknames or new surnames to their disciples, e.g., the Sons of Zebedee as the “Sons of Thunder,” it was uncommon to change a disciple’s first name. Christ gives Simon the new name “Peter” or Kephas (or Cephas) meaning rock.8

6. New Name = New Vocation:

In the Old Testament, God changing someone’s name denoted a special calling, a new vocation, e.g., Abram to Abraham, Sarai to Sarah, Jacob to Israel, etc. St. Peter’s name change denotes that he will have a special vocation among the twelve.

7. Special Meaning of Rock:

Obviously Christ was also referred to as the Rock, because he is the foundation of all things. However, in the rabbinical tradition, Abraham was also referred to as a rock: “Look to the rock from which you were hewn… look to Abraham your father” .9 Cardinal Ratzinger comments:10

Abraham, the father of faith, is by his faith the rock that holds back chaos, the onrushing primordial flood of destruction, and thus sustains creation. Simon, the first to confess Jesus as the Christ and the first witness of the Resurrection, now becomes by virtue of his Abrahamic faith, which is renewed in Christ, the rock that stands against the impure tide of unbelief and its destruction of man.

The Deliverance of St. Peter, Raffaello Sanzio (1514)

Unique Ministry

8. The Risen Christ Commissions St. Peter:

After the Resurrection, Christ appears to the Twelve and has a unique conversation with St. Peter. Christ, the Shepherd, asks St. Peter three times if he loves him. St. Peter responds yes all three times – presumably this passage should reflect his three denials. Christ also tell St. Peter and Peter alone: feed my lambs, tend my sheep, and feed my sheep. As the Vicar of Christ, St. Peter must care for the flock.11

9. Christ Prays for St. Peter:

In Lk 22:31-34, two major Petrine themes are evident. First, Satan has taken a special interest in St. Peter. He will fail, but will repent. Second, after St. Peter has “turned again” to Christ, Jesus commissions him to “strengthen the brethren.” Another mission given only to St. Peter.

10. The Keys:

In Matthew 16:13-20, the most famous unique call is given to St. Peter: to be the foundation of the Church and to exercise the authority of keys of the kingdom. The office given to St. Peter is that of the Vicar within the Davidic Kingdom. The Vicar governs in the King’s stead, according to the King’s rules, while the King is gone.12 St. Peter is the Vicar of Christ, the Pope.

The Martyrdom of St. Peter by Michelangelo

St. Peter & St. Paul

11. St. Paul Refers to Peter as Cephas:

St. Paul introduces St. Peter as the first witness of the Resurrection: “that [Christ] was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve” (I Cor 15:3-5; cf. 1:12, 3:22, 9:5). St. Paul refers to Peter as Cephas, emphasizing his name change and vocation.

12. St. Paul Presents Himself to Cephas:

The epistle of Galatians is paramount in understanding the Pauline/Petrine relationship. In the beginning of Galatians, St. Paul is attempting to validate his claim to be an apostle, though he was not one of the twelve. It’s important to note that St. Paul invokes Cephas twice to show that his vocation and apostolic claim are both valid. After receiving his call from Christ, St. Paul goes out and “does not confer with flesh and blood,” but rather three years later goes “to Jerusalem to visit Cephas.” Then after fourteen years, he returns to Jerusalem and privately tells the “pillars” of the Church his gospel, “lest somehow I should be running or had run in vain.” Again, he uses St. Peter as vindication, saying as Peter went to the circumcised, so he, Paul, goes to the uncircumcised. Then the “pillars” (Cephas, James, and John) “perceive the grace” in St. Paul and send him to the Gentiles with Barnabas. (Gal 1) It is important to note the role of hierarchy within St. Paul’s ministry, not only in validating his own role, but later in establishing his own hierarchal churches (cf. Timothy and Titus).

13. St. Paul Rebukes St. Peter:

A lot of ink has been spilled over this passage. First let us see that St. Paul had to show he had been validated by St. Peter in Gal 1 in order for people to accept his authority to then correct St. Peter in Gal 2. Furthermore, St. Peter’s primacy in the Church does not mean he is incapable of personal error or sin. St. Peter is also the apostle who denied Christ three times. The Popes confess their sins like every other Catholic, it is the office they hold that sets them apart.

  1. Mark 9:2-8 []
  2. Mark 14:33 []
  3. 54 []
  4. Matt 10:2-4; Mk 3:16-19; Lk 6:14-16; Acts 1:13 []
  5. Mk 1:36; Lk 9:32 []
  6. Mt 18:21 []
  7. Acts 5 []
  8. John 1:42; Mt 16 []
  9. Is 51:1-3 []
  10. 56 []
  11. John 21 []
  12. Is. 22 []